ELT World » DELTA Your local friendly TEFL blog Fri, 04 Jun 2010 05:32:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 en hourly 1 Should you really do the DELTA? /2008/05/should-you-really-do-the-delta/ /2008/05/should-you-really-do-the-delta/#comments Wed, 28 May 2008 11:18:00 +0000 david /2008/05/should-you-really-do-the-delta/ Jenny Johnson has written an article in support of doing the dreaded DELTA course over on the Guardian TEFL News website. As ever, the vast majority of this section of the Guardian is one giant promotional opportunity for Cactus TEFL, so beware what you read, take it all with a pinch of salt, etc. Never the less, as a major proponent of the Dip, I recommend this article as a good read for anyone thinking of doing the course. Here’s a short extract:

The Cambridge Delta (Diploma in English Language Teaching to Adults) is one of the most prestigious qualifications in the ELT field today. It is seen by the profession as the mark of a serious, dedicated teacher, one who has been in teaching for at least two years, often more, and who has decided to go deeper into the magic and mysteries behind teaching and learning.

Taking the Delta means putting aside a period of time – 8-12 weeks for an intensive course, six months to a year for a part time course, as well as finding a substantial sum of money for the course fees, which can cost anywhere between £1300 and £2500. Then there are the exam fees, another couple of hundred pounds on top. So the decision to go for the Delta is obviously a crucially important one.

Read the full article at the Guardian TEFL News website.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2008/05/should-you-really-do-the-delta/feed/ 4
Project DELTA /2008/02/project-delta/ /2008/02/project-delta/#comments Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:03:00 +0000 david /2008/02/project-delta/
I received a very interesting email from Nergiz Kern recently, informing me about Project DELTA, a wiki that Nergiz has set up relating to the DELTA course.

David’s Guide to the DELTA

Here’s some background info:

Who is this Wiki for?

  • For teachers like me who have just done the DELTA couresework component and are waiting for the exam results.
  • For teachers who are contemplating or have already signded up for a DELTA course.
  • For tutors to give them an idea what expectations and questions prospective DELTA candidates have and to get feedback from former DELTA candidates.

Why a Wiki about DELTA?

  • There are many exam preperation books for our students but no prep books for the DELTA.
  • I’ve searched the Internet a lot but couldn’t find many DELTA-related websites.
  • No matter how much they tell you to prepare well, you come unprepared for what it really is.
  • Because of the time pressure there was not much time to exchange ideas and talk about our experience and opinions. This wiki could become an extension of the course. Candidates who are doing the course or who have finished could meet up here and continue to talk and share.

This seems like it could develop into a fantastic resource and I’m sure will receive a lot of interest.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2008/02/project-delta/feed/ 0
DELTA Discourse advice /2008/02/delta-discourse-advice/ /2008/02/delta-discourse-advice/#comments Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:00:00 +0000 david /2008/02/delta-discourse-advice/ A very informative and interesting thread has opened up on the general discussion forum concerning the DELTA. The ever giving and knowlegdeable mmcmorrow has offered the following advice on those thinking of doing an assignment on discourse:

David’s Guide to the DELTA

This is a bit of advice for an assignment / lesson on ‘discourse’. My experience has been that this area is the one where DELTA candidates have the most difficulty with focus. Generally, teachers are on safe ground with grammar. They identify the system (grammar) and subsystem (eg verb tenses) and then choose one topic area within it to focus on – eg progressive aspect. They then come up with a title such as “helping elementary learners with the progressive aspect” – and they’re set. But with ‘discourse’, this process doesn’t go so smoothly and what you get are very wide-ranging, but necessarily superficial discussions of ‘discourse’ or ‘collocation’ or whatever in general. In other words, the teacher hasn’t gone through the third step of focusing on a particular topic within the field of collocation, for instance.

The other aspect of focus is finding the right balance between theory and practice – and this is also made much more difficult by trying to bite off more than you can chew! You’ve probably already been given a sort of template for assignments, but here’s one suggestion:

A: Intro (reason for selection of topic) 100-150 words

B: Analysis of topic (eg form / meaning / use / phonology / spelling – depending on what you’ve chosen) 700 – 750 words

C: Range of problems for learners (referring to own experience, observation as well as your sources, such as Swan & Smith ‘Learner English’ etc) 700 – 750 words

D: Strategies for teachers – a well-selected set of activities or approaches that deal with the problems for learners that you’ve mentioned above. Not a list – each suggestion should have a brief rationale, description, evaluation 700 – 750 words

E: Conclusion – eg implications for future practice or for other contexts 50 – 100 words

Anyway, as you can see, most of the theory is embedded in practical applications. So try to get the balance right – and also continuity – so that what you say about the problems for learners is reflected in your ideas for strategies for teachers.

I’ll add one more suggestion – I hope I’m not poking my nose in. Here are three things I like about lessons (or suggestions for classroom activities) when I get the chance to observe:

1) Here-and-now-ness

In other words, the topic and/or activities are for this place, these students (and teacher) and their interests. I’m not saying it all has to be original – but a complete coursebook based lesson is hardly likely to impress

2) Topic

I like lessons that are about something – not just language – and where there’s continuity of theme. Scott Thornbury wrote about this in an article in the ELTJ about 10 years ago. He quoted from EM Forster’s ‘Aspects of the Novel’ regarding the difference between a story and a plot. ‘The queen died and then the king died and then … there was this funny chicken …’: that’s a story: ‘The queen died and then the king died – of grief’: that’s a plot. Things happen in an order and for a reason.

3) Flexibility

If a plan has stated in advance everything that’s to happen, then it’s almost a statement of belief that students don’t matter – that what they say or do is of no possible interest to everyone. Pawns in the lesson plan! But good planning is the very opposite of predetermination. It’s the structure that allows student participation and teacher engagement. So, practically speaking, I think it makes sense to have A and B options later on in lesson plans to allow the teacher to make judgements based on his/her perceptions of student needs – as the lesson itself unfolds. A lesson isn’t a scripted play, it’s a structured impro.

By the way, it goes down particularly badly, I think, if a teacher has made a big point of learner autonomy in a background assignment, but then delivered a plan which predetermines every move. What you’re looking for overall is consistency – of beliefs, analysis, methodology, planning and performance. Consistency – and a core of effective classroom skills – not perfection!

Thanks to mmcmorrow for these great tips. See his fine article on teaching in New Zealand in the upcoming issue of the journal. Good luck to all those embroiled in the course as I write!

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2008/02/delta-discourse-advice/feed/ 0
Is it OK to Speak Engrish? /2007/12/is-it-ok-to-speak-engrish/ /2007/12/is-it-ok-to-speak-engrish/#comments Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:21:00 +0000 david /2007/12/is-it-ok-to-speak-engrish/
Language Transfer
, (also known as L1 interference, linguistic interference, and cross meaning) is most commonly discussed in the context of English language learning and teaching, but it can occur in any situation when someone does not have a native-level command of a language, as when translating into a second language. So, if you speak Chinglish (Chinese), Czenglish (Czech), Denglisch (German), Dunglish (Dutch) or even Engrish (or “Japlish”: Japanese), don’t worry, you’re not alone:

free pdf download

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2007/12/is-it-ok-to-speak-engrish/feed/ 0
A brief history of second language acquisition /2007/12/a-brief-history-of-second-language-acquisition/ /2007/12/a-brief-history-of-second-language-acquisition/#comments Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:28:00 +0000 david /2007/12/a-brief-history-of-second-language-acquisition/ As the suggests, this file offers a brief description of the history of L2 
acquisition…

free pdf download

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2007/12/a-brief-history-of-second-language-acquisition/feed/ 1
Proposed Changes to the DELTA /2007/11/proposed-changes-to-the-delta/ /2007/11/proposed-changes-to-the-delta/#comments Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:05:00 +0000 david /2007/11/proposed-changes-to-the-delta/ Here’s the latest on the proposed changes to the DELTA course, courtesy of the excellent mmcmorrow over on the Teacher Training Forum:

There’s a fairly comprehensive review article about DELTA and the changes that are coming up from Sept 2008 at:

http://www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/rs_nts29.pdf

Essentially, the main change will be modularisation. There will be three distinct modules, the first one more theoretical (assessed by an exam), the second more to do with teaching practice (assessed by observed lessons with supporting essays) and the third a specialisation (eg in teaching younger learners, assessed by a mini-dissertation).

There’ll also be more of a focus on teaching technologies (eg using internet, blogs, powerpoint, whatever).

The idea is to make the DELTA more do-able. It will also make it easier to fit into MA courses, each module leading to a certain number of credits – I would guess that it will work out as about a third of the credits towards a Master’s, but this will probably vary. I also think it’s likely that some MA courses will just slot in the second module of the DELTA as their practicum.

Read more about the DELTA and other qualifications at the Teacher Training Forum.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2007/11/proposed-changes-to-the-delta/feed/ 2
Why Start a Teacher Forum? /2007/11/why-start-a-teacher-forum/ /2007/11/why-start-a-teacher-forum/#comments Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:35:00 +0000 david /2007/11/why-start-a-teacher-forum/ ‘Why did you start your own English teachers forum?’ I’m often asked. Quite simply, I used to be a member of Dave’s ESL Cafe job discussion forums many, many moons ago. I stopped using the site when it became practically impossible to either talk about jobs or have any sort of worthwhile discussion there. To put it simply, it just got to the point where it wasn’t fun any more. It became pretty obvious that I wasn’t alone in thinking this, far from it. Things went on for a couple of years and then, when my amateur-crastinating looked like it would become serious procrastination (sorry!) I decided to do something about it. Hence David’s ELT World forums were born, a mere two and a half moths ago.

As far as other forums go, yes I am a member of others and I’m not afraid to publicize them here. I’m not the most frequent of participants but I do visit TEFL Watch, which is a great source for discussing dodgy language schools and sharing problems. I also visit the Developing Teachers forum, a website I really love. Naturally I spend most of my time at home, here at the ELT World forums though. I’m open to suggestions about other forums, or any ideas you have for improving ELT World. Drop by and let me know.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2007/11/why-start-a-teacher-forum/feed/ 0
More Recommended Texts for the DELTA /2007/10/more-recommended-texts-for-the-delta/ /2007/10/more-recommended-texts-for-the-delta/#comments Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:27:00 +0000 david /2007/10/more-recommended-texts-for-the-delta/ Over on the Teacher Training Forum people have been busy making further suggestions for suggested reading texts for the DELTA course.

Leprofdanglais suggests The English Verb by Michael Swan. ‘Lots of teachers hate it, but people should at least have read it’ he notes.

Michael Lewis, surely’ suggests Golightly. ‘What he has to say makes an awful lot of sense – indeed, writers of textbooks seem to think so, as his ideas pop up in various semi-mangled forms all over the place.’

David’s Guide to the DELTA

Justme adds several texts to the list: ‘a wonderful reference book: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language by David Crystal. A good place to start, and the bibliography proved invaluable. Also comes in handy when Turks try to tell you Kurdish isn’t a real language. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course by Marianne Celce-Murcia & Diane Larsen-Freeman. A form-meaning-use approach to grammar and grammar teaching. I still use this book. Again, a useful biblio, plus 2 indices– by topic and Words & Phrases. Learning About Language Assessment by Kathleen M. Bailey. Also good if you’re piloting a test, it has understandable (for math idiots like me) applications of statistics for assessing exams you’ve written.’

DMB cheekily adds, ‘A course in language teaching by Penny Ure is useful reading as the tutors base the course around it….. but they won’t tell you that.’

If anyone else has any suggestions, please add them b y commenting below or by joining the discussion over at the Teacher Training Forum.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2007/10/more-recommended-texts-for-the-delta/feed/ 0
21st Century Teacher Training: ITI Istanbul PART 2 /2007/09/21st-century-teacher-training-iti-istanbul-part-2/ /2007/09/21st-century-teacher-training-iti-istanbul-part-2/#comments Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:10:00 +0000 david /2007/09/21st-century-teacher-training-iti-istanbul-part-2/
Read the concluding part of the interview with the teacher trainers of ITI Istanbul:
Istanbul

Do you feel that courses such as CELTA and DELTA adequately prepare teachers of English? What would you do to change things if you could?

TOM

The short answer is no. However they serve a useful function. The CELTA was only ever designed as an introductory course but because of its ’success’ it is seen as a ’standard’ – which of course it is not.

DELTA – this has become a difficult course to complete when teaching a full load. I look forward to the revisions so that it can be more widely accessible to practising teachers. Like all courses they need constant review, revision and development.

SALLY

Under the circumstances yes they do. I find the CELTA scarily brief and the teachers that it produces frighteningly little prepared, but the good ones go on to train themselves and the not so good ones would not necessarily be that much better if you hung on to them for longer – just more resentful. If the course were longer it would have to be more expensive and we would just have a lot more totally unqualified people teaching English. It is as good a solution as we can get under the circumstances.

The DELTA, I believe in wholeheartedly. No course can be perfect, especially for something as multi-skilled and nebulous as teaching, but when you compare the DELTA with a Masters, which can be completed without anyone else ever setting foot in your classroom, the DELTA is about as good at targeting and developing the hands on practicalities of teaching as it can be (in it’s current form – I hope the upcoming changes do not try and make it into something more academic as well, it is just about right on the academic front – asking for understanding, but not immersion in theory.

BRIGID

In CELTA I would change the grading of the lessons during the course. It causes huge anxiety and seems to go against all the principles of teaching where we talk about affective factors being important. The list of generally obtuse criteria that keep growing – out!

DELTA seems to me one of the best courses going. The exam component is a bit antediluvian though.

Not enough good feedback on what constitutes ‘good’ assignments from C’ESOL point of view.

What things do you feel that you do that most benefit the trainee teachers at your organisation?

TOM

We empathise. We understand how difficult teaching is and we genuinely love teaching and want to help others.

SALLY

While there are sometimes peripheral changes, the underlying tutor base – combines a lot of experience with genuine enjoyment of teaching and training – no one is cynical, everyone has a variety of interests.

BRIGID

Our unassessed DELTA observations.
The flexibility of the tutors.
The course trainers.

What is the one thing that the ELT profession needs to do to progress in the 21st century?

TOM

Remember that teaching is done in a classroom and involves real people. Therefore it is unpredictable, creative, innovative and interesting.

SALLY

Remain curious and stay out of ivory towers.

BRIGID

To stop trying so hard to standardise these CELTA / DELTA courses that all life, spirit and enthusiasm gets killed.

Stop following trendy American pseudo psychology and concentrate more on in-service courses where the real teachers live and do more to cater to them.

Contact ITI Istanbul:
ITI
Beyoglu Is Merkezi. Kat.5
Istiklal Cad.
Beyoglu
Tel: 0090 212 245 9991
Fax: 0090 212 245 03 98

Learn more about teaching in Turkey at the ELT in Turkey blog.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2007/09/21st-century-teacher-training-iti-istanbul-part-2/feed/ 2
21st Century Teacher Training: ITI Istanbul /2007/09/21st-century-teacher-training-iti-istanbul/ /2007/09/21st-century-teacher-training-iti-istanbul/#comments Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:56:00 +0000 david /2007/09/21st-century-teacher-training-iti-istanbul/
The International Training Institute (ITI) specialises in teacher training and development. They have been conducting teacher training courses since 1988 and boast one of the highest success ratios worldwide. ITI is internationally recognised as a leading centre for the Cambridge CELTA and DELTA courses and is the only approved UCLES centre for both of these courses in Turkey. The institute is run by Tom Godfrey, who, along with Sally Hirst and Brigid Nugent, was kind enough to answer several questions about teacher training in the early twenty-first century. Here’s part one of the interview:
ITI Istanbul
Image courtesy of www.picturesfree.org
What are the main priorities in teacher training?

TOM

To ensure that training is participant centred. In other words it meets the developmental needs of the individual and does not attempt to espouse a methodology or standardisation.

SALLY

For the trainees:


-To achieve ‘unconscious competence’, or at least to see it as a viable and desirable goal, especially to understand the importance of ‘doing ordinary things very well’.
-Simultaneously (and it is not necessarily a contradiction in terms) to understand why they are doing what they are doing and why it works.
-For them to realise that if they are not enjoying it, it is highly likely that no one else in the room is either.

For the trainers:

-Do as you would be done by.
-Make sure you are still on the receiving end of some kind of education – language / training for training / anything, but something that reminds you sharply and frequently of how it feels to be a learner.
-Do what you would have them do.
-Don’t let schedules stop you from teaching language completely. If you are helping other people to develop their teaching, you should be teaching language to students too – training is not the same thing – even if, because of other demands, it is only a couple of hours a week.
-Your sessions must reflect what you are asking the CPs to achieve in their lessons – you should never have to turn round and say it is different for trainers in sessions.

BRIGID

Learning how to give good positive helpful feedback and having the ability to impart knowledge – it’s not enough to ‘have’ the knowledge

Do you think the demands in teacher training have changed in recent years? If so, how?

TOM

In the days when ‘methodology’ was considered ‘key’, training was more straightforward. Now, as in teaching, we realise that training is actually more to do with personality, identity and is context specific and there is no ‘right’ way.

SALLY

Not especially. I think all the things I’ve just written for question one (of the DELTA exam) would have been true twenty years ago (though I don’t know as I wasn’t training 20 years ago).

I do think some things are changing in education generally – both my trainees and my language students seem to expect delivery via technology – they (as Steve Darn said in one of the HLT articles this month) want everything written down and printed off for them, so having lost the interaction that they would have from making their own notes on content, one then ends up devising on line quizzes etc to make them go over content again. But that’s swings and roundabouts – the end amount of effort and the end result is probably the same (for trainer and trainee and for teacher and student).

BRIGID

Yes, with the online/blended courses, teacher trainers need better computer skills and need to be trained to give feedback online if that is part of the course. The latter seems to me incredibly important.

Read part two of the interview tomorrow.

>

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

]]>
/2007/09/21st-century-teacher-training-iti-istanbul/feed/ 0